On the Trinity 6

Summary: Scripture speaks of God's eyes, hands, and feet to suit the people's understanding; these describe his workings, for God is Spirit, simple, everywhere, and needs no members.

Show

Latin text · PL 3:922a–924a

Et licet Scriptura coelestis ad humanam formam faciem divinam saepe convertat, dum dicit: Oculi Domini super justos: aut dum: Odoratus est Dominus Deus odorem bonae fragrantiae: aut dum traduntur Moysi tabulae scriptae digito Dei: aut dum populus filiorum Israel de terra AEgypti manu valida et brachio excelso liberatur: aut dum dicit: Os enim Domini locutum est haec: aut dum terra scabellum pedum Dei esse perhibetur: aut dum dicit: Inclina aurem tuam, et audi: nos qui dicimus, quia Lex spiritalis est, non intra haec nostri corporis lineamenta, modum aut figuram divinae majestatis includimus, sed suis illam interminatae magnitudinis (ut ita dixerim) campis sine ullo fine diffundimus. Scriptum est enim: Si ascendero in coelum, tu ibi es: si descendero ad inferos, ades: et si assumpsero alas meas, et abiero trans mare, ibi manus tua apprehendet me, et dextera tua detinebit me. Rationem enim divinae Scripturae de temperamento dispositionis cognoscimus. Parabolis enim adhuc, secundum fidei tempus, de Deo Prophetes tunc loquebatur, non quomodo Deus erat, sed quomodo populus capere poterat. Ut igitur haec sic de Deo dicantur, non Deo, sed populo potius imputetur. Sic et tabernaculum erigere populo permittitur; nec tamen Deus intra tabernaculum clusus continetur; sic et templum exstruitur; nec tamen Deus intra templi angustias omnino sepitur. Non igitur mediocris est Deus, sed populi mediocris est sensus: nec angustus Deus, sed rationis populi angustus est intellectus habitus. Denique In Evangelio: Veniet hora, Dominus aiebat, cum neque in monte isto, neque in Hierusalem adorabitis Patrem, et causas reddidit dicens; Spiritus est Deus; et eos ergo qui adorant, in spiritu et veritate adorare oportet. Efficaciae igitur ibi divinae per membra monstrantur: non habitus Dei, nec corporalia lineamenta ponuntur. Nam et cum oculi describuntur, quod omnia videat exprimitur; et quando auris, quod omnia audiat proponitur; et cum digitus, significantia quaedam voluntatis aperitur; et cum nares, precum quasi odorum perceptio ostenditur; et cum manus, quod creaturae sit omnis auctor probatur; et quando brachium, quod nulla natura contra robur ipsius repugnare possit edicitur; et quando pedes, quod impleat omnia, nec sit quidquam ubi non sit Deus, explicatur. Neque enim sunt ei aut membra aut membrorum officia necessaria, ad cujus solum etiam tacitum arbitrium et serviunt et adsunt omnia. Cur enim requirat oculos, qui Lux est? aut cur quaerat pedes, qui ubique est? aut cur ingredi velit, cum non sit quo extra se progredi possit? aut cur manus expetat, cujus ad omnia instituenda artifex est et silens voluntas? Nec auribus eget, qui etiam tacitas novit voluntates. Aut propter quam causam linguam quaerat, cui cogitare jussisse est? Necessaria enim haec membra hominibus fuerunt, non Deo: quia inefficax hominis consilium fuisset, nisi cogitamen corpus implesset; Deo autem non necessaria, cujus voluntatem non tantum sine aliqua molitione opera subsequuntur, sed ipsa statim opera cum voluntate procedunt. Caeterum ipse totus oculus, quia totus videt; et totus auris, quia totus audit; et totus manus, quia totus operatur; et totus pes, quia totus ubique est. Idem enim quidquid illud est, totus aequalis est, et totus ubique est. Non enim habet in se diversitatem sui, quidquid est simplex. Ea enim demum in diversitatem membrorum recidunt, quae veniunt ex nativitate in dissolutionem. Sed haec quae concreta non sunt, sentire non possunt. Quod enim immortale est, quidquid est, illud ipsum unum et simplex et semper est. Et ideo quia unum est, dissolvi non potest; quoniam quidquid est illud ipsum extra jus dissolutionis positum, legibus est mortis solutum.

English · Claude translation

And although the heavenly Scripture often turns the divine countenance into a human form, when it says, “The eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous”; or when it says, “The Lord God smelled an odor of sweet fragrance”; or when tablets written by the finger of God are handed to Moses; or when the people of the children of Israel are set free from the land of Egypt by a strong hand and a lofty arm; or when it says, “For the mouth of the Lord has spoken these things”; or when the earth is said to be the footstool of God's feet; or when it says, “Incline your ear and hear”: we who say that the Law is spiritual do not enclose the measure or shape of the divine majesty within these outlines of our body, but spread it out without any limit over the plains (so to speak) of its boundless greatness. For it is written: “If I go up into heaven, you are there; if I go down to the underworld, you are present; and if I take my wings and go away across the sea, there your hand will lay hold of me and your right hand will hold me fast.” For we recognize the reasoning of divine Scripture from the adjustment of its arrangement. For the prophet then still spoke of God in parables, suited to the stage of faith at that time, not as God was, but as the people were able to grasp. That these things are said of God in this way, then, is to be charged not to God but rather to the people. So too the people are permitted to set up a tabernacle, and yet God is not shut up and contained within the tabernacle; so too a temple is built, and yet God is by no means fenced in within the narrow bounds of a temple. It is not God, then, who is limited, but the understanding of the people that is limited; not God who is narrow, but the understanding of the people's reason that is narrow.

Finally, in the Gospel the Lord said, “The hour will come when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem”; and he gave the reason, saying, “God is Spirit; and therefore those who worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.” There, then, it is the workings of God that are shown by the members, not the outward form of God or bodily outlines that are set out. For when eyes are described, it is expressed that he sees all things; and when an ear, it is put forward that he hears all things; and when a finger, a certain meaning of his will is disclosed; and when nostrils, his perception of prayers as though of fragrances is shown; and when a hand, it is proved that he is the author of every creature; and when an arm, it is declared that no nature can resist his strength; and when feet, it is explained that he fills all things and that there is nothing where God is not. For neither members nor the functions of members are necessary to him at whose will alone, even unspoken, all things both serve and are present. For why should he require eyes, who is Light? Or why should he seek feet, who is everywhere? Or why should he wish to walk, when there is nowhere outside himself to which he could go? Or why should he want hands, whose silent will is the artisan for establishing all things? Nor does he need ears, who knows even unspoken wishes. Or for what reason should he seek a tongue, for whom to think is to command? These members were necessary to men, not to God, because man's purpose would have been ineffective had the body not carried out his thought; but to God they are not necessary, since works not only follow his will without any effort, but the works themselves come forth at once together with the will. Rather, he is himself wholly eye, because he wholly sees; wholly ear, because he wholly hears; wholly hand, because he wholly works; and wholly foot, because he is wholly everywhere. For whatever he is, he is wholly equal and wholly everywhere. For whatever is simple has no diversity of itself within itself. For only those things fall into a diversity of members which come by birth into dissolution. But things that are not compounded cannot suffer this. For what is immortal, whatever it is, is itself one and simple and eternal. And therefore, because it is one, it cannot be dissolved; since whatever is itself placed beyond the rule of dissolution is freed from the laws of death.

About this passage

Source
PL 3:922a–924a · J.-P. Migne, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Latina 3 (Paris: Migne, 1865 printing), cols. 913–982 · Latin text: J.-P. Migne, Patrologia Latina 3, digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (patrologia_latina-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in PL 3. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; no textual problem is noted in this passage.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5 (1886) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Topics
Scripture and canon

Notes

Translation notes

  • The quotations and allusions are Ps 34:15 (33:16 Vulg.); Gen 8:21; Exod 31:18; Ps 136:12 (135:12 Vulg.; cf. Deut 5:15); Isa 1:20; Isa 66:1; 2 Kgs 19:16; Rom 7:14; Ps 139:8–10 (138:8–10 Vulg.); John 4:21, 24; and the tabernacle and temple (Exod 26; 1 Kgs 6). The prophet spoke “in parables, suited to the stage of faith at that time”: Novatian's principle of accommodation, that God adapts revelation to the capacity of its hearers.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's inline Scripture reference; Migne's inline Scripture reference (Exod 26); OCR: a for e; OCR: a for u; OCR: broken letter; OCR: c for e; OCR: l for f; OCR: l for t; OCR: letter dropped; OCR: li for h; OCR: misread letters; OCR: misread word; OCR: n for u; OCR: split word; OCR: stray dot and space; OCR: stray letter; OCR: t for l; OCR: uncertain character; OCR: uncertain characters; OCR: word divided at a line end; doubled colon): ant dum → aut dum; dicit:: Inclina → dicit: Inclina; intermi— natae → interminatae; sine ullo line → sine ullo fine; in ibi es → tu ibi es; quiomodo → quomodo; implitetur → imputetur; Sic (Exod. XXVI) et → Sic et; sic (III Reg. IV) et → sic et; medio eris → mediocris; Evangclio → Evangelio; aie(??)at → aiebat; Hierusatem → Hierusalem; sig(??)(??)ficantia → significantia; bracilium → brachium; posit edicitur → possit edicitur; nec sil quidquam → nec sit quidquam; ubi· que → ubique; jussissc → jussisse; moli ione → molitione; Non caim → Non enim; Ea cuim → Ea enim; racidunt → recidunt; anum et simplex → unum et simplex.

Cite this passage

Novatian, Trin. 6 (PL 3:922a–924a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/novatian-trinitate/6/).

The SBL abbreviation for this work has not been checked yet.

Plain text
Novatian, Trin. 6 (PL 3:922a–924a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/novatian-trinitate/6/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage