Against Celsus 2.55

Summary: Celsus's Jew compares the resurrection to Greek tales of heroes returning from Hades and dismisses its witnesses; Origen answers that the same objections could be made against Moses, so that defending Moses defends Jesus even more.

Textual problem in this passage: the printed text is uncertain or disputed here. See the notes.

Show

Greek text · Koetschau 1:178–179

μετὰ ταῦτά φησιν ὁ Ἰουδαῖος πρὸς τοὺς ἑαυτοῦ πολίτας τῷ Ἰησοῦ πιστεύοντας· φέρε δὴ καὶ πιστεύωμεν ὑμῖν τοῦτʼ εἰρῆσθαι. πόσοι δʼ ἄλλοι τοιαῦτα τερατεύονται, πειθοῦς ἕνεκα τῶν εὐήθως ἀκουόντων ἐνεργολαβοῦντες τῇ πλάνῃ; ὅπερ οὖν καὶ Ζάμολξιν ἐν Σκύθαις φασί, τὸν Πυθαγόρου δοῦλον, καὶ αὐτὸν Πυθαγόραν ἐν Ἰταλίᾳ καὶ Ῥαμψίνιτον ἐν Αἰγύπτῳ· τοῦτον μὲν καὶ „συγκυβεύειν“ ἐν ᾅδου „τῇ Δήμητρι“ καὶ ἀνελθεῖν „δῶρον“ „παρʼ αὐτῆς χειρόμακτρον χρυσοῦν“ φέροντα· καὶ μὴν καὶ Ὀρφέα ἐν Ὀδρύσαις καὶ Πρωτεσίλαον ἐν Θεσσαλίᾳ καὶ Ἡρακλέα ἐπὶ Ταινάρῳ καὶ Θησέα. Ἀλλʼ ἐκεῖνο σκεπτέον, εἴ τις ὡς ἀληθῶς ἀποθανὼν ἀνέστη ποτὲ αὐτῷ σώματι]· ἢ οἴεσθε τὰ μὲν τῶν ἄλλων μύθους εἶναί τε καὶ δοκεῖν, ὑμῖν δὲ τὴν καταστροφὴν τοῦ δράματος εὐσχημόνως ἢ πιθανῶς ἐφευρῆσθαι, τὴν ἐπὶ τοῦ σκόλοπος αὐτοῦ φωνήν, ὅτʼ ἀπέπνει, καὶ „τὸν σεισμὸν“ καὶ τὸν σκότον; ὅτι δὴ ζῶν μὲν οὐκ ἐπήρκεσεν ἑαυτῷ, νεκρὸς δʼ ἀνέστη καὶ τὰ σημεῖα τῆς κολάσεως ἔδειξε [καὶ τὰς χεῖρας ὡς ἦσαν πεπερονημέναι], τίς τοῦτο εἶδε; γυνὴ πάροιστρος, ὥς φατε, καὶ εἴ τις ἄλλος τῶν ἐκ τῆς αὐτῆς γοητείας, ἤτοι κατά τινα διάθεσιν ὀνειρώξας καὶ κατὰ τὴν αὐτοῦ βούλησιν δόξῃ πεπλανημένῃ φαντασιωθεὶς, ὅπερ ἤδη μυρίοις συμβέβηκεν, ἢ. ὅπερ μᾶλλον. ἐκπλῆξαι τοὺς λοιποὺς τῇ τερατείᾳ ταύτῃ θελήσας καὶ διὰ τοῦ τοιούτου ψεύσματος ἀφορμὴν ἄλλοις ἀγύρταις παρασχεῖν. ἐπεὶ οὖν Ἰουδαῖός ἐστιν ὁ ταῦτα λέγων, ὡς πρὸς Ἰουδαῖον ἀπολογούμεθα περὶ τοῦ ἡμετέρου Ἰησοῦ, κοινοποιοῦντες ἔτι τὸν λόγον περὶ Μωϋσέως καὶ λέγοντες αὐτῷ· πόσοι δʼ ἄλλοι τοιαῦτα τερατεύονται, ὁποῖα Μωϋσῆς, πειθοῦς ἕνεκα τῶν εὐήθως ἀκουόντων ἐνεργολαβοῦντες τῇ πλάνῃ; καὶ μᾶλλον κατὰ τὸν ἀπιστοῦντα Μωϋσεῖ ἐστι δυνατὸν παραθέσθαι τὸν Ζάμολξιν καὶ Πυθαγόραν τοὺς τερατευσαμένους ἤπερ τὸν Ἰουδαῖον. οὐ πάνυ φιλομαθῶς ἔχοντα πρὸς τὰς Ἑλλήνων ἱστορίας. καὶ ὁ Αἰγύπτιος δὲ ἀπιστῶν τοῖς περὶ Μωϋσέως παραδόξοις πιθανῶς παραθήσεται τὸν Ῥαμψίνιτον, λέγων πολλῷ τοῦτον εἶναι πιθανώτερον εἰς ᾅδου καταβεβηκέναι καὶ συγκεκυβευκέναι τῇ Δήμητρι καὶ χρυσοῦν χειρόμακτρον παρʼ αὐτῆς ἁρπάσαντα δεικνύναι σύμβολον τοῦ ἐν ᾅδου γεγονέναι κἀκεῖθεν ἀναβεβηκέναι Μωυσέως. ἑαυτὸν ἀναγράψαντος εἰσεληλυθέναι „εἰς τὸν γνόφον. ὅπου ἦν ὁ θεὸς.“ καὶ ὅτι μόνος ἤγγισε πρὸς τὸν θεὸν παρὰ τοὺς λοιπούς. ἀνέγραψε γὰρ οὕτως· „καὶ Μωϋσῆς μόνος ἐγγιεῖ πρὸς τὸν θεὸν. οἱ δὲ λοιποὶ οὐκ ἐγγιοῦσι.“ φήσομεν οὖν ἡμεῖς οἱ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ μαθηταὶ πρὸς τὸν ταῦτα λέγοντα Ἰουδαῖον· ἀπολογοῦ δὴ ἡμῖν περὶ τῆς εἰς Ἰησοῦν πίστεως ἐγκαλῶν καὶ λέγε τῷ Αἰγυπτίῳ καὶ τοῖς Ἕλλησι· τί φήσεις πρὸς ἃ ἤνεγκας κατὰ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ ἡμῶν ἐγκλήματα. φθάσαντα ἂν καὶ ἐπὶ Μωϋσέα; κἂν πάνυ δὲ ἀγωνίσῃ περὶ Μωϋσέως ἀπολογήσασθαι. ὥσπερ οὖν καὶ ἔχει πληκτικὸν λόγον καὶ ἐναργῆ τὰ περὶ αὐτοῦ, λήσεις σαυτὸν ἐν οἷς περὶ Μωϋσέως ἀπολογήσῃ, ἄκων συστήσας τὸν Ἰησοῦν Μωϋσέως θειότερον.

English · Claude translation

After this the Jew says to his fellow citizens who believe in Jesus: “Come now, let us even believe you that this was said. How many others tell such marvels to persuade simple hearers, making profit from their deceit? This is what they say of Zamolxis among the Scythians, the slave of Pythagoras, and of Pythagoras himself in Italy, and of Rhampsinitus in Egypt: that he even ‘played dice with Demeter’ in Hades and came up bringing ‘a golden napkin’ as ‘a gift from her’; and indeed of Orpheus among the Odrysians, Protesilaus in Thessaly, Heracles at Taenarum, and Theseus. But this must be examined: whether anyone who truly died ever rose again with the same body. Or do you think that the stories of the others are myths and seem so, while you have invented the ending of your drama becomingly or plausibly: his cry on the stake as he breathed his last, and ‘the earthquake’ and the darkness? That, although he could not help himself while alive, when dead he rose and showed the marks of his punishment: who saw this? A frantic woman, as you say, and perhaps someone else of the same sorcery, who either dreamed in a certain state of mind and, according to his own wish, had a vision in deluded fancy, which has happened to countless people, or, what is more likely, wished to astonish the rest with this marvel-mongering and by such a lie to give an opening to other beggar-priests.” Since the one saying this is a Jew, we make our defense of our Jesus as to a Jew, still applying the argument equally to Moses, and say to him: “How many others tell such marvels as Moses did, to persuade simple hearers, making profit from their deceit?” And it is more possible for one who disbelieves Moses to cite Zamolxis and Pythagoras, who told marvels, than for the Jew, who is not at all studious of Greek histories. The Egyptian, too, who disbelieves the marvels about Moses, will plausibly cite Rhampsinitus, saying that it is much more credible that he went down to Hades, played dice with Demeter, and, having snatched a golden napkin from her, showed it as a token that he had been in Hades and had come up from there, than that Moses did so, who wrote of himself that he entered “into the darkness where God was,” and that he alone drew near to God apart from the rest. For he wrote thus: “And Moses alone shall draw near to God, but the others shall not draw near.” So we, the disciples of Jesus, shall say to the Jew who says these things: “Defend yourself to us, you who accuse our faith in Jesus, and tell the Egyptian and the Greeks what you will say to the charges you have brought against our Jesus, which would first apply to Moses. And even if you strive hard to defend Moses, as indeed the account of him has a striking and clear argument, you will without noticing it, in defending Moses, have unwillingly established Jesus as more divine than Moses.”

About this passage

Source
Koetschau 1:178–179 · Paul Koetschau, ed., Origenes Werke 1–2: Gegen Celsus, GCS 2–3 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1899) · Greek text: P. Koetschau, Origenes Werke 1–2 (GCS 2–3, 1899), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library and published by the First Thousand Years of Greek project (Open Greek and Latin), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Koetschau, GCS 2–3. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; the problem in this passage is discussed in the notes.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Koetschau, GCS 2–3; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Extrabiblical texts
  • Herodotus, Hist. 4.94–96 (Herodotus, Histories) · allusion, high confidence
  • Herodotus, Hist. 2.122 (Herodotus, Histories) · quotation, high confidence
Topics
Christology

Notes

Translation notes

  • The stories of Zamolxis (Salmoxis) and Pythagoras are in Herodotus 4.94–96, and that of Rhampsinitus playing dice with Demeter in Herodotus 2.122. The heroes who returned from Hades (Orpheus, Protesilaus, Heracles, Theseus) are standard mythological examples. The “frantic woman” is Mary Magdalene (Mark 16:9; John 20:14–18). The biblical quotations are Matt 27:51 (earthquake), Exod 20:21, and Exod 24:2. The editor deletes “and his hands, how they had been pierced” (καὶ τὰς χεῖρας ὡς ἦσαν πεπερονημέναι), probably imported from 2.59, where Origen quotes Celsus with these words; they are not translated here. The square bracket after σώματι has no opening partner in the digital text.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray letters joined to the verb in the digital text): πιστεύωμενηι ὑμῖν → πιστεύωμεν ὑμῖν.

Cite this passage

Origen, Cels. 2.55 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/2/55/).

Plain text
Origen, Cels. 2.55 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/2/55/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage