Against Celsus 4.97
Summary: Celsus's claim that animals are dearer to God and hold holier conversations than humans would rank them above Socrates and Plato; any real bird-omens are demonic deceptions.
Greek text · Koetschau 1:369–371
Πῶς δʼ ἀσεβῶς ὑπὸ τοῦ ἀσέβειαν ἡμῖν ἐγκαλοῦντος εἴρηται τὸ οὐ μόνον σοφώτερα εἶναι τὰ ἄλογα τῶν ζῴων τῆς τῶν ἀνθρώπων φύσεως ἀλλὰ καὶ θεοφιλέστερα; καὶ τίς οὐκ ἂν ἀποτραπείη προσέχων ἀνθρώπῳ, λέγοντι δράκοντα καὶ ἀλώπεκα καὶ λύκον καὶ ἀετὸν καὶ ἱέρακα τῆς (τῶν) ἀνθρώπων φύσεως εἶναι θεοφιλέστερα; ἀκολουθεῖ δʼ αὐτῷ τὸ λέγειν ὅτι, εἴπερ θεοφιλέστερα τάδε τὰ ζῷα τῶν ἀνθρώπων. δῆλον ὅτι καὶ Σωκράτους καὶ Πλάτωνος καὶ Πυθαγόρου καὶ Φερεκύδου καὶ ὧν πρὸ βραχέος ὕμνησε θεολόγων θεοφιλέστερά ἐστι ταῦτα τὰ ζῷα. καὶ ἐπεύξαιτό γʼ ἄν τις αὐτῷ λέγων· εἴπερ θεοφιλέστερά ἐστι τάδε τὰ ζῷα τῶν ἀνθρώπων, γένοιο μετʼ ἐκείνων θεοφιλὴς καὶ ἐξομοιωθείης τοῖς κατὰ σὲ ἀνθρώπων θεοφιλεστέροις. καὶ μὴ ὑπολαμβανέτω γε ἀρὰν εἶναι τὸ τοιοῦτον· τίς γὰρ οὐκ ἂν εὔξαιτο οἷς πείθεται εἶναι θεοφιλεστέροις γενέσθαι πάντῃ παραπλήσιος, ἵνα καὶ αὐτὸς ὡς ἐκεῖνοι γένηται θεοφιλής; θέλων δὲ τὰς ὁμιλίας τῶν ἀλόγων ζῴων εἶναι τῶν ἡμετέρων ἱερωτέρας ὁ Κέλσος οὐ τοῖς τυχοῦσιν ἀνατίθησι τὴν ἱστορίαν ταύτην ἀλλὰ τοῖς συνετοῖς. συνετοὶ δὲ κατὰ ἀλήθειάν εἰσιν οἱ σπουδαῖοι, οὐδεὶς γὰρ φαῦλος συνετός. λέγει τοίνυν τὸν τρόπον τοῦτον, ὅτι φασὶ δὲ τῶν ἀνθρώπων οἱ συνετοὶ καὶ ὁμιλίας ἐκείνοις εἶναι, δηλονότι τῶν ἡμετέρων ἱερωτέρας, καὶ αὐτοί που γνωρίζειν τὰ λεγόμενα καὶ ἔργῳ δεικνύειν ὅτι οὐκ ἀγνοοῦσιν, ὅταν προειπόντες ὅτι ἔφασαν οἱ ὄρνιθες ὡς ἀπίασί ποι καὶ ποιήσουσι τόδε ἢ τόδε δεικνύωσιν ἀπελθόντας ἐκεῖ καὶ ποιοῦντας ἃ ἤδη προεῖπον. κατὰ μὲν οὖν τὸ ἀληθὲς οὐδεὶς συνετὸς τοιαῦτα ἱστόρησε, καὶ οὐδεὶς σοφὸς ἱερωτέρας εἶπεν εἶναι τὰς τῶν ἀλόγων ζῴων ὁμιλίας τῆς τῶν ἀνθρώπων. εἰ δʼ ὑπὲρ τοῦ ἐξετάσαι τὰ Κέλσου τἀκόλουθον σκοποῦμεν, δῆλον ὅτι κατʼ αὐτὸν ἱερώτεραι τῶν σεμνῶν Φερεκύδου καὶ Πυθαγόρου καὶ Σωκράτους καὶ Πλάτωνος καὶ τῶν φιλοσόφων ὁμιλιῶν εἰσιν αἱ τῶν ἀλόγων ζῴων· ὅπερ ἐστὶ καὶ αὐτόθεν οὐ μόνον ἀπεμφαῖνον ἀλλὰ καὶ ἀτοπώτατον. ἵνα δὲ καὶ πιστεύσωμέν τινας, ἐκ τῆς ἀσήμου φωνῆς τῶν ὀρνίθων μαθόντας ὅτι ἀπίασί ποι οἱ ὄρνιθες καὶ ποιήσουσι τόδε ἢ τόδε. προδηλοῦν, καὶ τοῦτʼ ἐροῦμεν ἀπὸ τῶν δαιμόνων συμβολικῶς ἀνθρώποις δεδηλῶσθαι κατὰ σκοπὸν τὸν περὶ τοῦ ἀπατηθῆναι ὑπὸ τῶν δαιμόνων τὸν ἄνθρωπον καὶ κατασπασθῆναι αὐτοῦ τὸν νοῦν ἀπʼ οὐρανοῦ καὶ θεοῦ ἐπὶ γῆν καὶ τὰ ἔτι κατωτέρω.
English · Claude translation
How impiously has the one who charges us with impiety said that irrational animals are not only wiser than human nature but also dearer to God! And who would not be turned away, if he paid attention to a man who says that the serpent, the fox, the wolf, the eagle, and the hawk are dearer to God than human nature? It follows for him to say that, if these animals are dearer to God than human beings, clearly these animals are dearer to God than Socrates and Plato and Pythagoras and Pherecydes and the theologians he praised a little earlier. And one might pray for him, saying: "If these animals are dearer to God than human beings, may you become dear to God with them, and be made like those who, in your view, are dearer to God than human beings." And let him not suppose such a thing to be a curse; for who would not pray to become wholly like those he is convinced are dearer to God, so that he himself may become dear to God as they are? Celsus, wishing the conversations of irrational animals to be holier than ours, does not attribute this report to ordinary people but to the intelligent. But the intelligent in truth are the good, for no wicked person is intelligent. He speaks, then, in this way: "And the intelligent among human beings say that they have conversations too, evidently holier than ours, and that they themselves somehow understand what is said and show by the deed that they are not ignorant, when, having said beforehand that the birds said they would go somewhere and do this or that, they show them going there and doing what they had already foretold." In truth no intelligent person has reported such things, and no wise person has said that the conversations of irrational animals are holier than those of human beings. But if, to examine Celsus's views, we look at what follows from them, it is clear that on his view the conversations of irrational animals are holier than the venerable conversations of Pherecydes, Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, and the philosophers; which is plainly not only incongruous but most absurd. But even if we should believe that some people, learning from the inarticulate cry of birds that the birds will go somewhere and do this or that, foretell it, we will say that this too has been shown to human beings symbolically by the demons, with the aim that man should be deceived by the demons and his mind dragged down from heaven and God to earth and to things still lower.
About this passage
Notes
Translation notes
- The parenthetical (τῶν) is the editor's supplement.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (missing breathings and accents in the digital text): καὶ ων πρὸ βραχέος υμνησε → καὶ ὧν πρὸ βραχέος ὕμνησε.
Cite this passage
Origen, Cels. 4.97 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/4/97/).
Plain text
Origen, Cels. 4.97 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/4/97/).
Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)
Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text