Against Marcion 5.6

Summary: The hidden wisdom Paul speaks of was the Creator's, veiled in figures and revealed in Christ; the rulers who crucified the Lord of glory, the one foundation, the temple of God, and the folly of worldly wisdom all point to the Creator.

Textual problem in this passage: the printed text is uncertain or disputed here. See the notes.

Show

Latin text · CSEL 47:588–592

Igitur per haec omnia ostendit, cuius dei sapientiam loquatur inter perfectos, eius scilicet, qui sapientiam sapientium abstulerit et prudentiam prudentium inritam fecerit, qui infatuauerit sapientia mundi, stulta eligens eius et disponens in salutem. hanc dicit sapientiam in occulto fuisse, quae fuerit in stultis et in pusillis et (in) inhonestis, quae latuerit etiam sub figuris, allegoriis et aenigmatibus. reuelanda postmodum in Christo, posito in lumen nationum a creatore promittente per Esaiae uocem patefacturum se thesauros inuisibiles et occultos. nam ut absconderit aliquid is deus, qui nihil egit omnino, in quod aliquid abscondisse existimaretur, satis incredibile. ipse si esset, latere non posset, nedum aliqua eius sacramenta. creator autem tam ipse notus quam et sacramenta eius, palam scilicet decurrentia apud Israhel, sed de significantiis obumbrata, in quibus sapientia dei delitiscebat. inter perfectos narranda suo in tempore, proposita uero in proposito dei ante saecula. cuius et saecula, nisi creatoris? si enim et saecula temporibus structa sunt, tempora autem diebus et mensibus et annis compinguntur, dies porro et menses et anni solibus et lunis et sideribus creatoris signantur in hoc ab eo positis, — et erunt enim, inquit, in signa mensium et annorum — apparet et saecula creatoris esse et omne, quod ante saecula propositum dicatur, non alterius esse, quam cuius et saecula. aut probet dei sui saecula Marcion; ostendat et mundum ipsum, in quo saecula deputentur, uas quodammodo temporum, et signa aliqua uel organa eorum. si nihil demonstrat, reuertor, ut et illud dicam: cur autem ante saecula creatoris proposuit gloriam nostram? posset uideri eam ante saecula proposuisse, quam introductione saeculi reuelasset. at cum id facit paene iam totis saeculis creatoris prodactis, uane ante saecula proposuit et non magis intra saecula quod reuelaturus erat paene post saecula. non enim eius est festinasse in proponendo, cuius est retardasse in reuelando. creatori autem competit utrumque: et ante saecula proposuisse et in fine saeculorum reuelasse, quia et quod proposuit et reuelauit medio spatio saeculorum in figuris et aenigmatibus et allegoriis praeministrauit. sed quia subicit de gloria nostra, quod eam nemo ex principibus huius aeui scierit, ceterum si scissent, numquam dominum gloriae crucifixissent, argumentatur haereticus principes huius aeui dominum ***, alterius scilicet dei Christum, crucifixerit, ut et hoc in ipsum redigat creatorem. porro cui supra ostenderimus, quibus modis gloria nostra a creatore sit t deputanda, praeiudicatum esse debebit eam, quae in occulto fuerit apud creatorem, merito igno(ra)tam etiam ab omnibus uirtutibus et potestatibus creatoris, quia nec famulis liceat consilia nosse dominorum, nedum illis apostatis angelis ipsique principi transgressionis, diabolo, quos magis extraneos fuisse contenderim ob culpam ab omni conscientia dispositionum creatoris. sed iam nec mihi competit (principes huius aeui uirtutes et potestates interpretari creatoris, quia ignorantiam illis adscribit apostolus. Iesum enim et secundum nostrum euangelium diabolus quoque in temptatione cognouit, et secundum commune instrumentum spiritus nequam sciebat eum sanctum dei esse et Iesum uocari et in perditionem eorum uenisse. etiam parabola fortis illius armati, quem alius ualidior oppressit et uasa eius occupauit, ***, si in creatoris accipitur apud Marcionem, iam nec ignorasse ultra potuit creator dominum gloriae, dum ab eo opprimitur, nec in cruce eum figere, aduersus quem ualere non potuit, et superest, ut — secundum me quidem credibile sit — scientes uirtutes et potestates creatoris dominum gloriae, Christum suum, crucifixerint, qua desperatione et malitiae redundantia serui quoque scelestissimi dominos suos interficere non dubitant; scriptum est enim apud me satanam in Iudam introisse. secundum autem Marcionem nec apostolus hoc loco patitur ignorantiam adscribi uirtutibus creatoris in gloriae dominum, quia scilicet non illas uult intellegi principes huius aeui. quod si non uidetur de spiritalibus dixisse principibus, ergo de saecularibus dixit, de populo principali, utique non inter nationes, de ipsis archontibus eius, de rege Herode, etiam de Pilato, et quo maior principatus huius aeui, Romana dignitas praesidebat. ita et cum destruuntur argumentationes diuersae partis, nostrae expositiones aedificantur. sed uis adhuc gloriam nostram dei tui esse et apud eum in occulto fuisse. et quare adhuc eodem et deus instrumento et apostolus nititur? quid illi cum sententiis prophetarum ubique? quis enim cognouit sensum domini, et quis illi consiliarius fuit? Esaiae est. quid illi etiam cum exemplis dei nostri? nam quod architectum se prudentem adfirmat, hoc inuenimus significari depalatorem disciplinae diuinae a creatore per Esaiam: auferam enim, inquit, a Iudaea inter cetera et sapientem architectum. et numqui non ipse tunc Paulus destinabatur, de Iudaea, id est de Iudaismo, auferri habens in aedificationem Christianismi, positurus unicum fundamentum, quod est Christus? quia et de hoc per eundem prophetam creator:. ecce ego, inquit, inicio in fundamenta Sionis lapidem pretiosum, honorabilem, et qui in eum crediderit non confundetur. nisi si structorem se terreni operis deus profitebatur, ut non de Christo suo significaret, qui futurus esset fundamentum credentium in eum. super quod prout quisque superstruxerit, dignam scilicet uel indignam doctrinam, si opus. eius per ignem probabitur, si merces illi per ignem rependetur, creatoris est, quia per ignem iudicatur nostra superaedificatio, utique sui fundamenti, id est sui Christi. Nescitis quod templum dei sitis et in uobis inhabitet spiritus. dei? si homo et res et opus et imago et similitudo — et caro per terram et anima per afflatum — creatoris est, totus ergo in alieno habitat deus Marcionis, si non, creatoris sumus. templum. quod si templum dei quis uitiauerit, uitiabitur, utique a deo templi. ultorem intentans creatorem intentauit. stulti estote, ut sitis sapientes. quare? sapientia. enim huius mundi stultitia est penes deum. penes quem deum? si nihil nobis et ad hunc sensum pristina praeiudicauerunt, bene, quod et hic adstruit: scriptum est enim: deprehendens sapientes in nequitia illorum; et rursus: dominus scit cogitationes sapientium, quod sint superuacuae. in totum enim praescriptum a nobis erit nulla illum sententia uti potuisse eius dei, quem destruere deberet, si non illi doceret. ergo, inquit, nemo glorietur in homine, et hoc secundum creatoris disciplinam: miserum hominem, qui spem habet in hominem et: bonum est fidere in deo, quam fidere in hominibus; ita et gloriari.

English · Claude translation

So by all these things he shows of which God it is that he speaks the wisdom among the perfect: of him, namely, who took away the wisdom of the wise and brought to nothing the understanding of the prudent, who made foolish the wisdom of the world, choosing its foolish things and appointing them for salvation. This wisdom, he says, was hidden: it lay in things foolish and small and dishonourable, and it lay concealed also under figures, allegories, and riddles, to be revealed afterwards in Christ, who was set as a light of the nations by the Creator, who promised through the voice of Isaiah that he would open up treasures unseen and hidden. For that the god who did nothing at all in which he might be thought to have hidden something should have hidden anything is quite incredible. If he himself existed, he could not stay hidden, much less any mysteries of his. But the Creator is as well known himself as his mysteries are, which ran their course openly in Israel, yet were overshadowed as to their meanings, and in them the wisdom of God lay hidden: to be told among the perfect in its own time, but set forth in God's purpose before the ages. And whose are the ages, if not the Creator's? For if the ages are built of times, and times are put together from days and months and years, and days and months and years are marked by the Creator's suns and moons and stars, set by him for this purpose (“and they shall be,” he says, “for signs of months and years”), it is plain that the ages too are the Creator's, and that whatever is said to have been purposed before the ages belongs to no other than him whose the ages are. Or let Marcion prove that the ages belong to his god; let him also show the world itself in which ages may be reckoned, the vessel, so to speak, of the times, and some signs or instruments of them. If he shows nothing, I return to say this too: why did he purpose our glory before the Creator's ages? It might seem that he had purposed it before the ages if he had revealed it at the beginning of the age. But since he does so when almost the whole of the Creator's ages has already run out, he purposed it before the ages to no purpose, and not rather within the ages, since he was going to reveal it almost after the ages. For it does not belong to one who was slow in revealing to have been in a hurry in purposing. But both suit the Creator: to have purposed before the ages and to have revealed at the end of the ages, because what he both purposed and revealed he prepared in the intervening span of the ages in figures and riddles and allegories. But since he adds about our glory that none of the rulers of this age knew it, and that if they had known it they would never have crucified the Lord of glory, the heretic argues that the rulers of this age crucified the Lord …, that is, the Christ of the other god, so as to lay this too at the door of the Creator. Now, since we have shown above in what ways our glory is to be ascribed to the Creator, it must be taken as settled that the glory which was hidden with the Creator was rightly unknown also to all the Creator's virtues and powers, since not even servants may know their masters' plans, much less those apostate angels and the prince of transgression himself, the devil, whom I would contend were, because of their guilt, all the more strangers to any knowledge of the Creator's arrangements. But it no longer suits me either to take the rulers of this age as the Creator's virtues and powers, because the apostle ascribes ignorance to them. For even the devil, according to our Gospel too, recognized Jesus in the temptation; and according to the common document the evil spirit knew that he was the Holy One of God and was called Jesus and had come to destroy them. Also the parable of that strong armed man, whom another, stronger man overpowered and whose goods he seized, …: if in Marcion's reading it is taken of the Creator, then the Creator could no longer have been ignorant of the Lord of glory while he was being overpowered by him, nor could he have fixed on a cross the one against whom he had no strength. And it remains (credible enough on my view) that the Creator's virtues and powers, knowing the Lord of glory, their own Christ, crucified him, with that despair and overflowing malice with which even the most wicked slaves do not hesitate to kill their masters; for it is written in my Gospel that Satan entered into Judas. But according to Marcion, the apostle in this place does not allow ignorance of the Lord of glory to be ascribed to the Creator's powers, since he does not want them understood as the rulers of this age. And if he does not seem to have spoken of spiritual rulers, then he spoke of worldly ones: of the ruling people (not among the nations, of course), of its own rulers, of King Herod, and also of Pilate, and, above him, of the greater power of this age, the Roman authority that presided over them. So, when the arguments of the other side are torn down, our interpretations are built up. But you still want our glory to belong to your god and to have been hidden with him. Then why does both the god and the apostle still lean on the same document? What has he to do everywhere with the sayings of the prophets? “For who has known the mind of the Lord, and who has been his counsellor?” That is Isaiah's. What has he to do, too, with the examples of our God? For when he affirms that he is a wise master builder, we find this meant by the Creator through Isaiah of one who would lay out the divine rule of life: “For I will take away from Judaea,” he says, among other things, “the wise master builder.” And was it not Paul himself who was then marked out, destined to be taken away from Judaea, that is, from Judaism, for the building of Christianity, to lay the one foundation, which is Christ? For of this too the Creator says through the same prophet: “Behold, I am laying in the foundations of Zion a precious stone, held in honour, and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.” Unless God was professing himself a builder of an earthly work, so as not to be pointing to his Christ, who was to be the foundation of those who believe in him. On this foundation, according as each builds on it doctrine worthy or unworthy, if his work is to be tested by fire, if his reward is to be paid out through fire, it is the Creator's doing, because through fire our superstructure is judged, the superstructure, of course, on his own foundation, that is, on his own Christ. “Do you not know that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?” If man (thing and work and image and likeness, flesh from the earth and soul from the breath) is the Creator's, then, if we are not the Creator's temple, Marcion's god dwells wholly in what belongs to another. “If anyone corrupts the temple of God, he will be corrupted,” by the God of the temple, of course. In threatening an avenger he has threatened the Creator. “Be fools, that you may be wise.” Why? “For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.” With which God? Even if the earlier arguments have settled nothing for us in favour of this sense, it is well that he confirms it here too: “For it is written, ‘He catches the wise in their wickedness,’ and again, ‘The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are futile.’” For on the whole we shall have laid it down that he could not have used any saying of that God whom he ought to be destroying, if he were not teaching in his service. “So,” he says, “let no one boast in man”: and this too is according to the Creator's rule of life: “Wretched is the man who puts his hope in man,” and, “It is better to trust in God than to trust in men”; and so too with boasting.

About this passage

Source
CSEL 47:588–592 · Emil Kroymann, ed., Quinti Septimi Florentis Tertulliani Opera, Pars 3, CSEL 47 (Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag, 1906), 290–650 · Latin text: Emil Kroymann (CSEL 47), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in CSEL 47. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; the problem in this passage is discussed in the notes.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Topics
Heresy, Christology, Scripture and canon

Notes

Translation notes

  • The quotations are 1 Cor 2:6–8, 16; 3:10–13, 16–21; Isa 42:6; Isa 45:3; Gen 1:14; Isa 40:13; Isa 3:3; Isa 28:16; Job 5:13; Ps 94:11 (93:11 Vulg.); Jer 17:5; Ps 118:8 (117:8 Vulg.). The devil's recognition and the demon's cry are Luke 4:1–13 and 4:34; the strong man is Luke 11:21–22; Satan entering Judas is Luke 22:3. “***” marks gaps in the text, shown as “…”; a stray “t” (probably a crux) stands before “deputanda” (“to be ascribed”). “Our Gospel” is the church's Gospel, “the common document” the Gospel text Marcion shared (his edited Luke).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR misreading of I as l; OCR misreading of Iesum): legum enim et secundum → Iesum enim et secundum; in ludam → in Iudam.

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Marc. 5.6 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-marcionem/5/6/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Marc. 5.6 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-marcionem/5/6/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage