To the Nations 2.8

Summary: Local gods are unknown even to their own towns, and the Egyptians worship animals and even a man: Serapis, Tertullian argues, was really the patriarch Joseph, deified for his grain policy.

Textual problem in this passage: the printed text is uncertain or disputed here. See the notes.

Show

Latin text · Oehler 1:364–367

Superest gentile illud genus inter populos deorum, quos libidine sumptos, non pro notitia veritatis, docet privata notitia. Deum ergo existimo ubique notum, ubique praesentem, ubique dominantem, omnibus colendum, omnibus demerendum. At enim cum illi quoque, quos totus orbis communiter colit, excidant probationi verae divinitatis, quanto magis isti quos ne ipsi quidem municipes sui norunt? Nam quae idonea auctoritas praecucurrit eiusmodi theologiae quam etiam fama destituit? Quanti sunt qui norint visu vel auditu Atargatim Syrorum, Caelestem Afrorum, Varsutinam Maurorum, Obodan et Dusarem Arabum, Belenum Noricum, vel quos Varro ponit: Casiniensium Deluentinum, Narniensium Visidianum, Atinensium Numiternum, Asculanorum Anchariam, et quam perceperint Vulsiniensium Nortiam, quorum ne nominum quidem dignitas humanis cognominibus distat? Satis rideo etiam deos decuriones cuiusque municipii, quibus honor intra muros suos determinatur. Haec libertas adoptandorum deorum quousque profecerit Aegyptiorum superstitiones docent, qui etiam bestias privatas colunt feles, crocodilos et anguem suum. Parum est, si etiam hominem consacraverunt, illum dico quem non iam Aegyptus aut Graecia, verum totus orbis colit et Afri iurant, de cuius statu quid conici potest apud nostras litteras, ut verisimile videatur, positum est. Nam Serapis iste quidam olim Ioseph dictus fuit, de genere sanctorum. Iunior inter ceteros fratres, sed excelsior ingenio ab isdem fratribus per livorem venum in Aegyptum datus serviebat in familia regis Aegyptiorum Pharao. A regina minus pudica desideratus, sed quia non obsequebatur, e contrario ab eadem delatus a rege in carcerem datur. Illic somnia quibusdam non perperam interpretatus vim spiritus sui ostendit. Interea rex quoque somniat terribilia quaedam. Illi detractus quod convocatus erat valuit exponere Ioseph, experimenta de carcere edocuit, somnium regi aperit: illos boves septem opimissimos, diffluentes, totidem annorum ubertatem significare, posteriores aeque septem enectos subsequentium septem annorum inopiam praedicare. Suadet itaque de recondendis praesidiis in futuram famem de copia priore. Credidit rex: exitus rerum et prudentem et sanctum semper et necessarium probavit. Itaque Pharao universae Aegypto et frumentandae et exinde curandae eum praefecit. Hunc Serapidem ex suggestu, quo caput eius ornatum, vocaverunt; cuius suggestus modialis figura frumentationis eius memoriam obsignat, et curam frugum super caput eius fuisse ipsis spicis, quibus per ambitum notatur, apparet. Propterea et canem, quem apud inferos deputant, sub dextera eius dicaverunt, quod sub manu eius compressa cura Aegyptiorum. Et Phariam adiungunt, quam filiam regis Pharao derivatio nominis esse demonstrat. Nam et tunc Pharao inter cetera honorum et remunerationum filiam quoque in matrimonium ei dederat. Sed quia et feras et homines colere susceperant, utramque faciem in unum Anubin contulerunt, in quo naturae condicionisque suae potius argumenta videri posset consecrasse gens rixosa, suis regibus recontrans, in extraneis deiecta, sane et gula et spurcitia canina etiam servi ipsa.

English · Claude translation

There remains that national kind of gods among the peoples, which a merely local knowledge shows to have been taken up by whim, not out of knowledge of the truth. I consider God, then, to be known everywhere, present everywhere, ruling everywhere, to be worshipped by all and to be won over by all. But since even those whom the whole world worships in common fall short of the proof of true divinity, how much more these whom not even their own townsmen know? For what fit authority has gone before such a theology, which even rumor has abandoned? How many are there who know by sight or by hearing Atargatis of the Syrians, Caelestis of the Africans, Varsutina of the Moors, Obodas and Dusares of the Arabs, Belenus of Noricum, or those whom Varro lists: Delventinus of the people of Casinum, Visidianus of Narnia, Numiternus of Atina, Ancharia of Asculum, and Nortia, whom the Volsinians have received, gods whose names do not even differ in dignity from human surnames? I laugh enough, too, at the gods who are town councillors of each municipality, whose honor is confined within their own walls. How far this freedom of adopting gods has gone is shown by the superstitions of the Egyptians, who even worship their own private beasts, cats, crocodiles, and their snake. It is a small matter that they have also deified a man: I mean the one whom not only Egypt or Greece but the whole world worships, and by whom the Africans swear. What can be conjectured about his state from our writings, so as to seem likely, is set down here. For this Serapis was once called Joseph, of the race of the saints. Younger than his other brothers, but loftier in mind, he was sold into Egypt by those same brothers out of envy and served in the household of Pharaoh, king of the Egyptians. Desired by the unchaste queen, but refusing to comply, he was instead denounced by her and cast into prison by the king. There, by interpreting dreams for certain persons correctly, he showed the power of his spirit. Meanwhile the king too dreams certain terrible things. Joseph was brought out to him, because, when summoned, he was able to explain them, having given proof of this in prison; and he opens the dream to the king: that those seven very fat and sleek cows signified the plenty of as many years, and the seven after them, likewise starved, foretold the want of the seven years following. So he advises laying up stores out of the earlier plenty against the famine to come. The king believed him; the outcome proved him prudent, holy, and always indispensable. So Pharaoh set him over all Egypt, to gather in the grain and afterwards to manage it. Him they called Serapis from the headdress with which his head was adorned; the bushel-shaped figure of this headdress seals the memory of his grain-gathering, and the ears of grain with which it is marked round about show that the care of the crops rested on his head. For this reason too they placed under his right hand the dog, which they assign to the underworld, because the Egyptians were held under his hand and care. And they join to him Pharia, whom the derivation of her name shows to be the daughter of king Pharaoh. For at that time Pharaoh, among his other honors and rewards, had also given him his daughter in marriage. But since they had undertaken to worship both beasts and men, they combined both faces into one Anubis, in whom one might rather see the proofs of its own nature and condition which that quarrelsome nation had consecrated: rebellious toward its own kings, abject before foreigners, and indeed a slave itself to a dog's gluttony and filth.

About this passage

Source
Oehler 1:364–367 · Franz Oehler, ed., Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani quae supersunt omnia, vol. 1 (Leipzig: T. O. Weigel, 1853), 305–395 · Latin text: Franz Oehler (Oehler 1), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library (canonical-latinLit), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Oehler 1. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; the problem in this passage is discussed in the notes.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Oehler 1; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture

Notes

Translation notes

  • The identification of Serapis with Joseph is Tertullian's own euhemerist conjecture. The story follows Gen 37, 39, and 41, but differs in details: Genesis has the wife of Potiphar, not a queen, and gives Joseph Asenath, daughter of the priest of On (Gen 41:45), not a daughter of Pharaoh.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (l misread for I in the digital text; stray period in the digital text): loseph → Ioseph; non perperam. interpretatus → non perperam interpretatus.

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Nat. 2.8 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-nationes/2/8/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Nat. 2.8 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-nationes/2/8/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage