Against Praxeas 1

Summary: Praxeas brought to Rome the heresy that the Father himself was born and suffered, and also turned the bishop of Rome against the New Prophecy; Tertullian announces his refutation.

Show

Latin text · CSEL 47:227–228

Varie diabolus aemulatus est ueritatem. adfectauit illam aliquando defendendo concutere. unicum deum uindicat, omnipotentem mundi conditorem, ut et de unico haeresim faciat. ipsum dicit patrem descendisse in uirginem, ipsum ex ea natum, ipsum passum; denique ipsum esse Iesum Christum. excidit sibi coluber, quia Iesum Christum post baptisma Iohannis temptans ut filium dei adgressus est, certus filium deum habere uel ex ipsis scripturis, de quibus tunc temptationem struebat: si tu es filius dei, dic, ut lapides isti panes fiant; item: si tu es filius dei, deice te hinc; scriptum est enim, quod mandauit angelis suis super te,- utique pater-ut te manibus suis tollant necubi ad lapidem pedem tuum offendas. aut numquid mendacium euangeliis exprobrabit dicens: (uiderit Matheus et Lucas, ceterum ego ad ipsum deum accessi, ipsum omnipotentem cominus temptaui; ideo et accessi, ideo et temptaui. ceterum si filius dei esset, numquam illum temptasse dignarer. sedenim ipse potius a primordio mendax est, et si quem hominem de suo subornauerit, ut Praxean. nam iste primus ex Asia hoc genus peruersitatis intulit Romanae humo, (homo) et alias inquietus, insuper de iactatione martyrii inflatus ob solum et simplex et breue carceris taedium; quando, et si corpus suum tradidisset exurendum, nihil profecisset, dilectionem dei non habens, cuius charismata quoque expugnauit. nam idem tunc episcopum Romanum, agnoscentem iam prophetias Montani Priscae Maximillae et ex ea agnitione pacem ecclesiis Asiae et Phrygiae inferentem, falsa de ipsis prophetis et ecclesiis eorum adseuerando et praecessorum eius auctoritates defendendo coegit et litteras pacis reuocare iam emissas et a proposito recipiendorum charismatum concessare. ita duo negotia diaboli Praxeas Romae procurauit: prophetiam expulit et haeresim intulit, paracletum fugauit et patrem crucifixit. fruticauerant auenae Praxeanae hic quoque, superseminatae dormientibus multis in simplicitate doctrinae; traductae dehinc per quem deus uoluit etiam euulsae uidebantur. denique cauerat pristinum doctor de emendatione sua, et manet chirographum apud psychicos, apud quos tunc gesta res est. exinde silentium. et nos quidem postea agnitio paracleti atque defensio disiunxit a psychicis. auenae uero illae ubique tunc semen excusserant. id aliquamdiu per hypocrisin subdola uiuacitate latitauit et nunc denuo erupit. sed et denuo eradicabitur, si uoluerit dominus, in isto commeatu; si quo minus, die suo colligentur omnes adulterae fruges et cum ceteris scandalis igni inextinguibili cremabuntur.

English · Claude translation

In various ways the devil has rivaled the truth. Sometimes he has tried to shake it by defending it. He champions one only God, the almighty maker of the world, so as to make a heresy even out of the oneness. He says that the Father himself came down into the virgin, was himself born of her, himself suffered; in short, that he himself is Jesus Christ. The serpent forgot himself: for when he tempted Jesus Christ after John's baptism, he approached him as the Son of God, sure that God had a Son, even from the very Scriptures out of which he was then building his temptation: “If you are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread”; and again, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down from here; for it is written that he has given his angels charge over you” (he, that is, the Father) “that they may lift you up in their hands, lest you strike your foot against a stone.” Or will he reproach the Gospels with a lie, saying: “Let Matthew and Luke see to it; but I approached God himself, I tempted the Almighty himself face to face; that is why I approached, that is why I tempted. But if he had been the Son of God, I would never have deigned to tempt him”? But he himself is rather a liar from the beginning, and so is any man he has suborned of his own, like Praxeas. For this man was the first to bring this kind of perversity from Asia to Roman soil, a restless man in other ways too, and puffed up besides with boasting of martyrdom on account of a mere, simple, short spell of tedium in prison; when, even if he had handed over his body to be burned, he would have gained nothing, not having the love of God, whose spiritual gifts he also fought against. For when the bishop of Rome was already acknowledging the prophecies of Montanus, Prisca, and Maximilla, and on the strength of that acknowledgment was bestowing peace on the churches of Asia and Phrygia, this same man, by asserting falsehoods about these prophets and their churches and by defending the authority of his predecessors, forced him both to recall the letters of peace already sent out and to desist from his purpose of receiving the spiritual gifts. So Praxeas did two pieces of the devil's business at Rome: he drove out prophecy and brought in heresy; he put the Paraclete to flight and crucified the Father. Praxeas' tares had sprouted here too, sown over the good seed while many slept in the simplicity of their doctrine; then, exposed through the one God chose, they even seemed to have been pulled up. In fact the teacher had given a written guarantee of his amendment, and the document remains with the psychics, among whom the matter was then transacted. From then on, silence. And we, indeed, were afterwards separated from the psychics by our acknowledgment and defense of the Paraclete. But those tares had then shaken out their seed everywhere. For some time it lay hidden, with a cunning vitality, through hypocrisy, and now it has broken out afresh. But it will be rooted out afresh too, if the Lord wills, in this season of respite; if not, on its own day all the adulterous crops will be gathered and burned with the other stumbling blocks in unquenchable fire.

About this passage

Source
CSEL 47:227–228 · Emil Kroymann, ed., Quinti Septimi Florentis Tertulliani Opera, Pars 3, CSEL 47 (Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag, 1906), 227–289 · Latin text: Emil Kroymann (CSEL 47), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in CSEL 47. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; no textual problem is noted in this passage.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Kroymann, CSEL 47 (1906); made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Topics
Trinity, Christology, Heresy

Notes

Translation notes

  • The quotations are Matt 4:3, 6 (Luke 4:3, 9-11; Ps 91:11-12, 90:11-12 Vulg.), and the allusions John 8:44, 1 Cor 13:3, Matt 13:25, 30, 41-42, and Mark 9:43. “Psychics” (psychici, “natural men”) is Tertullian's Montanist name for Catholics who rejected the New Prophecy; he here speaks openly as its adherent. The bishop of Rome is unnamed (perhaps Eleutherus or Victor). The digital text prints “legum” for “Iesum” (Jesus) throughout this work, an OCR error; it is corrected where it occurs.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR error in the digital text (legum for Iesum)): ipsum esse legum Christum → ipsum esse Iesum Christum; quia legum Christum post → quia Iesum Christum post.

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Prax. 1 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-praxean/1/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Prax. 1 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-praxean/1/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage