Against Celsus 5.38

Summary: Celsus's rule fails when people of different customs meet: must an Ethiopian among Arabians die or betray his gods? The Egyptian gods are nature allegories, and Sarapis a recent magical invention.

Show

Greek text · Koetschau 2:41–43

Βούλομαι δὲ παραστῆσαι, τίνα τρόπον οὐκ εὐλόγως ὁ Κέλσος φησὶν ἕκαστον τὰ οἰκεῖα καὶ πάτρια σέβειν. φησὶ γὰρ οὗτος τοὺς οἰκοῦντας τὴν Μερόην Αἰθίοπας δύο μόνους εἰδέναι θεοὺς, Δία καὶ Διόνυσον, καὶ αὐτοὺς μόνους σέβειν τοὺς δʼ Ἀραβίους καὶ αὐτοὺς δύο μόνους, Διόνυσον μὲν ὡς καὶ Αἰθίοπες, Οὐρανίαν δὲ ἰδίαν. κατὰ τὴν ἱστορίαν αὐτοῦ οὔτʼ Αἰθίοπες Οὐρανίαν σέβουσιν οὔτε Ἀράβιοι Δία. ἆρʼ οὖν ἐάν τις Αἰθιόπων, ἔκ τινος περιστάσεως γενόμενος παρὰ τοῖς Ἀραβίοις, ἀσεβὴς εἶναι νομισθῇ ὡς τὴν Οὐρανίαν οὐ σέβων καὶ παρὰ τοῦτο τὴν ἐπὶ θανάτῳ κινδυνεύῃ, καθήξει τῷ Αἰθίοπι ἀποθανεῖν ἢ παρὰ τὰ πάτρια ποιεῖν καὶ προσκυνεῖν τὴν Οὐρανίαν; εἰ μὲν γὰρ παρὰ τὰ πάτρια ποιεῖν αὐτὸν καθήξει, οὐχ ὅσιον ποιήσει ὅσον ἐπὶ τοῖς τοῦ Κέλσου λόγοις· εἰ δὲ τὴν ἐπὶ θανάτῳ ἀπαχθείη, παραστησάτω τὸ εὔλογον τοῦ αἱρεῖσθαι θάνατον, οὐκ οἶδα εἰ τοῦ Αἰθιόπων λόγου φιλοσοφεῖν διδάσκοντος περὶ ψυχῆς ἀθανασίας καὶ τιμῆς τῆς ἐπὶ εὐσεβείᾳ, εἰ (κατὰ) τοὺς πατρίους νόμους σέβοιεν νομιζομένους θεούς. τὸ δʼ ὅμοιον ἔστιν εἰπεῖν καὶ περὶ Ἀραβίων, ἔκ τινος περιστάσεως ἐπιδημησάντων Αἰθίοψι τοῖς περὶ Μερόην. καὶ οὗτοι γὰρ μόνους διδαχθέντες σέβειν Οὐρανίαν καὶ Διόνυσον οὐ προσκυνήσουσι τὸν Δία μετὰ τῶν Αἰθιόπων· καὶ ἀσεβεῖν νομισθέντες εἰ τὴν ἐπὶ θανάτῳ [ἂν] ἀπάγοιντο, τί ἂν εὐλόγως ποιήσαιεν, λεγέτω ὁ Κέλσος. τοὺς δὲ περὶ Ὄσιριν καὶ Ἶσιν μύθους περισσόν ἐστιν ἡμῖν νῦν καταλέγειν καὶ οὐκ εὔκαιρον. κἂν τροπολογῶνται δὲ οἱ μῦθοι. τὸ ἄψυχον ἡμᾶς ὕδωρ σέβειν διδάξουσι καὶ τὴν ὑποκειμένην ἀνθρώποις καὶ πᾶσι ζῴοις γῆν. οὕτω γὰρ οἶμαι μεταλαμβάνουσι τὸν μὲν Ὄσιριν εἰς ὕδωρ τὴν δὲ Ἶσιν εἰς γῆν. περὶ δὲ Σαράπιδος πολλὴ καὶ διάφωνος ἱστορία, χθὲς καὶ πρώην εἰς μέσον ἐλθόντος κατά τινας μαγγανείας τοῦ βουληθέντος Πτολεμαίου οἱονεὶ ἐπιφανῆ δεῖξαι τοῖς ἐν Ἀλεξανδρείᾳ θεόν. ἀνέγνωμεν δὲ παρὰ Νουμηνίῳ τῷ Πυθαγορείῳ περὶ τῆς κατασκευῆς αὐτοῦ, ὡς ἄρα πάντων τῶν ὑπὸ φύσεως διοικουμένων μετέχει οὐσίας ζῴων καὶ φυτῶν· ἵνα δόξῃ μετὰ τῶν ἀτελέστων τελετῶν καὶ τῶν καλουσῶν δαίμονας μαγγανειῶν οὐχ ὑπὸ ἀγαλματοποιῶν μόνων κατασκευάζεσθαι θεὸς ἀλλὰ καὶ ὑπὸ μάγων καὶ φαρμακῶν καὶ τῶν ἐπῳδαῖς αὐτῶν κηλουμένων δαιμόνων.

English · Claude translation

I wish to show how unreasonably Celsus says that each should revere his own and ancestral gods. For he says that the Ethiopians who live in Meroe know only two gods, Zeus and Dionysus, and revere them alone; and the Arabians also only two, Dionysus, as the Ethiopians do, and Urania, their own. According to his account, neither do the Ethiopians revere Urania nor the Arabians Zeus. If, then, an Ethiopian, finding himself among the Arabians by some circumstance, were thought impious for not revering Urania, and were in danger of death for this, would it be right for the Ethiopian to die, or to act contrary to his ancestral customs and worship Urania? If it is right for him to act contrary to his ancestral customs, he will act unholily, as far as Celsus's words go; but if he were led off to death, let him show the reasonableness of choosing death, when I do not know whether the Ethiopian doctrine teaches them to philosophize about the immortality of the soul and the honour for piety, if they revere the gods held such according to their ancestral laws. The same can be said about Arabians who by some circumstance stay among the Ethiopians around Meroe. For they too, taught to revere Urania and Dionysus alone, will not worship Zeus with the Ethiopians; and if, thought to be impious, they were led off to death, let Celsus say what they would reasonably do. As for the myths about Osiris and Isis, it is superfluous and untimely for us to list them now. Even if the myths are interpreted figuratively, they will teach us to revere lifeless water and the earth that lies beneath human beings and all animals; for so, I think, they take Osiris as water and Isis as earth. About Sarapis there is a long and conflicting story: he came onto the scene only yesterday or the day before, through certain magical practices of Ptolemy, who wished to show the people of Alexandria a god, as it were, made manifest. We have read in Numenius the Pythagorean about his construction, that he shares in the substance of all the animals and plants administered by nature; so that he might seem to be made a god, with impious rites and magic that invokes demons, not by sculptors alone but also by magicians and sorcerers and by the demons charmed by their incantations.

About this passage

Source
Koetschau 2:41–43 · Paul Koetschau, ed., Origenes Werke 1–2: Gegen Celsus, GCS 2–3 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1899) · Greek text: P. Koetschau, Origenes Werke 1–2 (GCS 2–3, 1899), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library and published by the First Thousand Years of Greek project (Open Greek and Latin), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Koetschau, GCS 2–3. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; no textual problem is noted in this passage.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Koetschau, GCS 2–3; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Extrabiblical texts
  • Numenius, fr. 53 (Numenius of Apamea) · allusion, high confidence

Notes

Translation notes

  • The parenthetical (κατὰ) is the editor's supplement, and the bracketed [ἂν] is deleted. Origen draws on a lost work of Numenius of Apamea (2nd c.), the Pythagorean-Platonist (fragment 53 des Places).

Cite this passage

Origen, Cels. 5.38 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/5/38/).

Plain text
Origen, Cels. 5.38 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/5/38/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage