Against Celsus 7.63

Summary: The same act can spring from different doctrines, as Stoics, Epicureans, and the uneducated all avoid adultery for very different reasons, so Christians' refusal of images must be judged by its reasons.

Show

Greek text · Koetschau 2:212–213

Καὶ πρὸς ταῦτα δὲ λεκτέον ὅτι, εἴπερ Σκύθαι καὶ Λιβύων οἱ Νομάδες καὶ Σῆρες, οὕς φησιν ἀθέους εἶναι ὁ Κέλσος. καὶ ἄλλα ἔθνη δυσαγέστατα καὶ ἀνομώτατα ἀλλὰ καὶ Πέρσαι οὐκ ἀνέχονται νεὼς ὁρῶντες καὶ βωμοὺς καὶ ἀγάλματα, οὐ παρὰ τοῦτο ἴσον ἐστὶ τὸ μὴ ἀνέχεσθαι τούτων ἐκείνους τῷ καὶ ἡμᾶς μὴ ἀνέχεσθαι αὐτῶν. ἐξεταστέον γὰρ τὰ δόγματα, ἀφʼ ὧν ὁρμώμενοι οὐκ ἀνέχονται ναῶν καὶ ἀγαλμάτων οἱ μὴ ἀνεχόμενοί γε αὐτῶν· ἵνʼ, εἰ μὲν ἀπὸ ὑγιῶν δογμάτων οὐκ ἀνέχεται. ἐπαινῆται ὁ μὴ ἀνεχόμενος, εἰ δʼ ἀπὸ ἐσφαλμένων, ψέγηται. δυνατὸν γὰρ τὸ αὐτὸ ἀπὸ διαφόρων δογμάτων γίνεσθαι. οἷον ἐπὶ παραδείγματος ἐκκλίνουσι τὸ μοιχεύειν οἱ τὰ τοῦ Κιτιέως Ζήνωνος φιλοσοφοῦντες ἀλλὰ καὶ οἱ τὰ Ἐπικούρου τινὲς δὲ καὶ τῶν παντελῶς ἰδιωτῶν. ἀλλʼ ὅρα ὅση διαφωνία ἐστὶ περὶ τῆς τοῦ μοιχεύειν ἐκκλίσεως τῶν τοσούτων· οἱ μὲν διὰ τὸ κοινωνικὸν καὶ παρὰ φύσιν εἶναι τῷ λογικῷ ζῴῳ νοθεύειν τὴν ὑπὸ τῶν νόμων ἑτέρῳ προκαταληφθεῖσαν γυναῖκα καὶ φθείρειν τὸν ἄλλου ἀνθρώπου οἶκον, οἱ δὲ ἀπὸ Ἐπικούρου οὐ διὰ τοῦτο οὐ μοιχεύουσιν, ὅτε ἀπέχονται τοῦ μοιχεύειν. ἀλλὰ διὰ τὸ νενομικέναι τέλος τὴν ἡδονὴν, πολλὰ δʼ ἀπαντᾶν κωλυτικὰ τῆς ἡδονῆς τῷ εἴξαντι μιᾷ τῇ τοῦ μοιχεύειν ἡδονῇ καὶ ἔσθʼ ὅτε φυλακὰς ἢ θανάτους πολλάκις δὲ πρὸ τούτων καὶ κινδύνους κατὰ τὸ ἐπιτηρεῖν τὴν τοῦ ἀνδρὸς ἔξοδον ἀπὸ τῆς οἰκίας καὶ τῶν τὰ ἐκείνου φρονούντων· ὡς εἰ καθʼ ὑπόθεσιν μοιχεύοντα οἷόν τʼ ἦν λαθεῖν καὶ τὸν ἄνδρα τῆς γυναικὸς καὶ τοὺς οἰκείους πάντας αὐτοῦ καὶ τοὺς, παρʼ οἷς τις ἐκ τοῦ μοιχεύειν ἀδοξεῖ. κἂν ἐμοίχευσε διὰ τὴν ἡδονὴν ὁ Ἐπικούρειος. εἰ δὲ καὶ ὁ ἰδιώτης ποτὲ παρὸν μοιχεύειν οὐ μοιχεύει, εὑρεθείη ἂν ἐνίοτε διὰ τὸν ἐνεστῶτα ἐκ τοῦ νόμου φόβον καὶ τὰς κολάσεις (οὐ) μοιχεύων. καὶ οὐ διὰ τὸ θηρᾶσθαι πλείονας ἡδονὰς ὁ τοιοῦτος ἀπέχοιτʼ ἂν τοῦ μοιχεύειν. ὁρᾷς οὖν ὅτι τὸ ἓν εἶναι νομιζόμενον ἔργον. ἡ τῆς μοιχείας ἀποχὴ, παρὰ τὰς προθέσεις τῶν ἀπεχομένων οὐ ταὐτὸν ἀλλὰ διάφορον γίνεται· ἢ γὰρ ἀπὸ ὑγιῶν δογμάτων ἢ ἀπὸ μοχθηρῶν καὶ ἀσεβεστάτων τῶν ἐν τῷ Ἐπικουρείῳ ἢ τῷ τοιῷδε ἰδιώτῃ.

English · Claude translation

To this too we must say that, even if the Scythians, the Nomads of Libya, and the Seres, whom Celsus calls godless, and other nations most unholy and lawless, and the Persians too, cannot bear to see temples and altars and images, it does not follow that their not bearing these things is the same as our not bearing them. For the doctrines must be examined from which those who cannot bear temples and images start, so that the one who cannot bear them may be praised if he refuses from sound doctrines, and blamed if from mistaken ones. For the same thing can arise from different doctrines. For example, those who follow the philosophy of Zeno of Citium avoid adultery, and so do those who follow Epicurus, and some of the wholly uneducated too. But see how much disagreement there is among so many about avoiding adultery. The first avoid it because it is against the common good and against the nature of a rational being to corrupt a woman who by law already belongs to another and to ruin another man's household; the followers of Epicurus, when they refrain from adultery, do not refrain for this reason, but because they have taken pleasure as the end, and many things hindering pleasure befall one who gives way to the single pleasure of adultery, sometimes imprisonment or death, and often, before these, dangers in watching for the husband to leave the house and for those who take his side; so that if, supposedly, an adulterer could escape the notice of the woman's husband, all his household, and those in whose eyes one is disgraced by adultery, the Epicurean would commit adultery for the sake of pleasure. And if the uneducated man also sometimes does not commit adultery when he could, he would sometimes be found not committing adultery because of the fear arising from the law and its punishments, and such a man would not be refraining from adultery in order to hunt for greater pleasures. You see, then, that what is thought to be one act, abstention from adultery, is not the same but different according to the purposes of those who abstain; for it comes either from sound doctrines, or from wicked and most impious ones, like those of the Epicurean or of such an uneducated man.

About this passage

Source
Koetschau 2:212–213 · Paul Koetschau, ed., Origenes Werke 1–2: Gegen Celsus, GCS 2–3 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1899) · Greek text: P. Koetschau, Origenes Werke 1–2 (GCS 2–3, 1899), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library and published by the First Thousand Years of Greek project (Open Greek and Latin), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Koetschau, GCS 2–3. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; no textual problem is noted in this passage.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Koetschau, GCS 2–3; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Topics
Ethics, Marriage

Notes

Translation notes

  • The digital text reads “ἐκ τοῦ μοιχεύειν χεύειν,” a dittography; corrected. The editor's supplement “(οὐ)” (“not”) is followed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (repeated syllables in the digital text): μοιχεύειν χεύειν ἀδοξεῖ → μοιχεύειν ἀδοξεῖ.

Cite this passage

Origen, Cels. 7.63 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/7/63/).

Plain text
Origen, Cels. 7.63 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/7/63/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage