Octavius 16.2
Summary: Caecilius both affirmed the gods and claimed to be undecided, but not from cunning.
Latin text · CSEL 2:20
nam interim deos credere, interim se deliberare uariauit, ut propositionis incerto incertior responsionis nostrae intentio fundaretur. sed in Natali meo uersutiam nolo, non credo: procul est ab eius simplicitate subtilis urbanitas. quid igitur?
English · Claude translation
For he varied, now believing in gods, now saying that he was deliberating, so that the aim of our answer might be laid on a foundation more uncertain than the uncertainty of his proposition. But in my Natalis I do not wish to assume cunning, I do not believe it: subtle sophistication is far from his simplicity. What then?
About this passage
Notes
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: "in" read as "m" and "d" as "a" throughout the phrase (interim ... interim).): mcerim aeos creaere, mteum se aeliberare → interim deos credere, interim se deliberare.
Cite this passage
Minucius Felix, Oct. 16.2 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/minucius-octavius/16/2/).
Plain text
Minucius Felix, Oct. 16.2 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/minucius-octavius/16/2/).
Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)
Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text